Human Science and History - 1015 Words

â€Å"The historian’s task is to understand the past; the human scientist, by contrast, is looking to change the future.† To what extent is this true in these areas of knowledge? As historians study, compiles and writes events in chronological order or arranged events in the order it came to be, people understood what came before them. Historians are the authority on it that no one ever tried to question what was written but instead we accepted it as facts and from those facts we learned and knew that as time and years go by people could and can change the future. As clear as the question implies history and human sciences are the two areas of knowledge involved. Human science was defined as the study and interpretation of the experiences,†¦show more content†¦It was not something to carry around. Now we have all the I’s from the apple store such as iphone, itouch, ipad, our development of Macbooks, and all the technologies with different brands availabl e for easier and faster usage. Those gadgets are so important to us and to our daily lives that we cannot just imagine living without one of them. Those gadgets are also convenient. Through language, historians made us realized that history would always be history. It would always be there. It is something of the past for the future. We believed in what was written thousand years ago, affecting each and everyone of us on how we go on with our lives. Though on the other hand, why could we not rewrite what was written for easier to understanding? Are we 100% sure that it is true? Without the inventions and innovations of human scientists we would not have what we have now. Our lives would be very different. It would have been at a slower pace. We would not know what lies in the other side of the globe. It was so clever of the human scientists to invent something that could lead to a change in our future. For instance, the invention of airplane. Isn’t it great that we could be i n one continent to the next inShow MoreRelatedSocial Science : A Study Of Human, History, Ideology And Mythistory, And Answers1268 Words   |  6 PagesSocial science is said to be the study of human,history,ideology and mythistory,and answers the question of how life came to be the way it is.Generations made aware of how modernity came about,what history was really about,for example the columbus story,relive them from the stress or worries about the traditional days.Social science through the years has acted as weapon and has been used to fight and influence race and racism.These two concepts,though different in definition are highly connectedRead MoreSimilarities And Differences Between The Human Mind And Science, History, And Literature1486 Words   |  6 Pagespsychology, history, and literature† to conduct their anthropology (McGee and Warms 2004:525). The work of Sapir and Whorf had made revolutionary claims about the idea of knowledge and the mechanism behind its t ransmission. Symbolic anthropology could use this as a base with which to launch assumptions about knowledge and culture; science, after all, isn’t primary or even essential in these processes. The human mind, however, was. The traditional studies of literature, psychology, and history areRead MoreThe Theory Of Knowledge Has Reflected Upon For Many Years Now1384 Words   |  6 Pagesparticular Areas of Knowing (Human Sciences, and History), have been identified as following this quote, but I disagree. The human sciences uses people as the basis for gaining knowledge, and is not only the systematic organization of facts. Likewise, History is more complex and person dependent, rather than only being a systematic organization of facts. The human sciences is a unique area of knowledge because it is one of the only areas out of the eight identified, that uses humans as the predominant wayRead MoreHumans have come to accept that History by mere definition is the exploration and study of history1000 Words   |  4 PagesHumans have come to accept that History by mere definition is the exploration and study of history whereas the Human Sciences are defined as the in depth study of social, biological and cultural aspects of human beings. History and Human Sciences seek to influence humans through language, reason, and emotion. By looking at the title, I am coming to the conclusion that historians only focus on understanding the past and the human scientist is only looking to change the future. That conclusion is reasonableRead MoreHistory Of Science And Conceptual Understanding919 Words   |  4 PagesHistory of science and conceptual understanding According to Richard K Moran, and Page K, in â€Å" Teaching for Conceptual Understanding in Science†, Studying history of science is important because it enable students understand the development of thought, and generalization would be empty without concrete examples. In addition, One important concern for shutting history of science out of the undergraduate science curriculum was an anxiety expressed about the history of science that the historyRead MoreWhat Is the Task of the Historian?966 Words   |  4 Pagesunderstand the past; the human scientist, by contrast, is looking to change the future.† To what extent is this true in these areas of knowledge?† To start off, I think it would be useful to differentiate between history as an area of knowledge with the human sciences. History is knowledge about the past. What happens in the present and what will happen in the future is very much governed by what happened in the past. Without knowledge of the past, we would be without identity. History is regarded differentlyRead MoreThe History of Nursing Science1076 Words   |  4 Pagesothers seem hardwired into our human nature, and have expressed themselves in a multitude of ways throughout human history, from mothers tending to their sick children to soldiers caring for their wounded brothers on the battlefield. But nursing science, the body of knowledge that has both arisen from and informed the nursing profession as we now know it, has a distinct history that can be traced through key periods of development and revolution. By examining this rich history, we can see not only howRead MoreEssay on Views on the Importance of Science1010 Wo rds   |  5 PagesViews on the Importance of Science Different people have different views on the importance of scientific concepts in comparison to other branches of knowledge. In order to determine if it is reasonable to believe that science is a supreme form of knowledge, firstly we must determine what knowledge is. Knowledge can be seen as the act of knowing or understanding gained through experience or study. Thus in order for something to be considered as knowledge it must be trueRead MoreEssay on Sociology and Social Sciences1144 Words   |  5 Pagesï » ¿The Social Sciences Complete and submit this assignment by the due date to receive full credit. (7 points) 1. Rank the seven social sciences (anthropology, economics, geography, history, political science, psychology, and sociology) according to what you believe is their importance and influence on the people in a modern society. Answer: 1.Psychology (How humans think influences most, if not all of the social sciences.)   2.Sociology (This helps figure out how society thinks. If you understandRead MoreThe Fundamental Knowledge Of Knowledge1637 Words   |  7 PagesThe fundamental knowledge issue arising from this question is whether knowledge is consistent throughout time. Can we progress through applying knowledge generated decades ago? To determine whether knowledge generated from areas such as history and science can predict the future, it is necessary to know whether the knowledge acquired through these areas of knowing is consistent, irrespective of changes in time and culture, amongst other factors. Through considering this question, we are gaining insight